AI surrogates for physics simulation
Our models run 10⁴–10⁶× faster than the codes used in fusion R&D: particle-in-cell, gyrokinetic and MHD. Faster simulation means more design iterations, and more iterations means a shorter path to fusion. We built them on the hardest case there is: turbulent plasma, outside the fluid regime, and they learn it from a minimum of training simulations.
Academic pedigree
Evaluation time
Illustrative · logarithmic axisOne reactor-relevant run can cost millions of CPU-hours. The surrogate answers in milliseconds.
Time to evaluate one operating point, on a logarithmic axis. Speedups of 10⁴–10⁶× are measured against standard particle-in-cell codes; over 10⁴× has been demonstrated on real plasma simulations. Chart is illustrative; benchmark data available under NDA.
The bottleneck
Standard plasma codes, such as WarpX and other particle-in-cell solvers, are physically faithful but extremely expensive. Gyrokinetic and MHD codes carry the same cost. A single reactor-relevant run can cost millions of CPU-hours.
Design iteration, control synthesis and uncertainty quantification become impractical. The constraint on fusion R&D is throughput.
Our models learn from those codes and stand in for them. Same physics, orders of magnitude less compute, and so orders of magnitude faster.
Faster answers mean more design iterations. More iterations mean a shorter path to fusion.
Architecture
The local component captures small-scale structure that other AI surrogates lose. Fine-scale physics survives the speedup.
Plasma confinement isn't cubic. Not being bound to a Cartesian grid means realistic reactor geometries, and far better generalisation across configurations.
A physics-informed parameterisation gives stable training dynamics, and realistic evolution over long horizons.
Because the physics is built into the architecture, our models learn from a minimum of training simulations. You do not need to generate a large dataset before the model is useful.
Over 10⁴× demonstrated on real plasma simulations, not internal benchmarks of our own design. Your simulation data is never used to train models for anyone else.
Beyond fusion
Fusion is the focus today. The same architecture applies wherever the simulation is the bottleneck.
Kinetic, turbulent plasma outside the fluid regime: the hardest case, and where we started.
Aerodynamics and industrial fluid dynamics, where design iteration runs into the same compute wall.
Fluid and plasma simulation for film and games, where the constraint is turnaround rather than tolerance.
Core team
Bloomberg Distinguished Professor, Johns Hopkins University.
Faculty, King's College London. AI Institute and Physics.
Former faculty, Stockholm University.
Physics-AI Fellow, University of Cambridge.
Commercialisation of scientific innovation.
Commercial strategy, pilots and industrial partnerships.
Award-winning researchers in physics and AI, with a decade of work on extracting physics from simulations too expensive to run at scale.
Contact
Tell us which code you run and which decision you're trying to make faster. If a surrogate fits your problem we'll say so. If it doesn't, we'll say that too.